|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Christophe
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Belgium
|
serial RS232 communication between PIC16 and PXA255 �C + br |
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:54 am |
|
|
Hi,
our device has mainly 2 processors. A PIC16 and PXA255 (larger with usb etc). They communicate via there SUART. Now this is a 2 line communication. There pins are connected via 2 pcb tracks 0.35mm thick and about 20cm long; max 40cm.
Now the question is; what can I set for maximum baudrate between the two? The faster, the more performant the system will be; but what is the limit? |
|
|
PCM programmer
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 21708
|
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 12:09 pm |
|
|
Electrically, there is no problem. You could run at several MHz without
problems. The limitations will be in your USART modules. Read the
specifications on your USARTs, to see what their maximum speed is. |
|
|
Christophe
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 323 Location: Belgium
|
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:29 am |
|
|
Hi,
thanks for the input.
Page 114 of the PIC16F877A datasheet: seems that you can set baud rates up to 57600 bits/s.
though when I do:
Code: | #use rs232(baud=57600,parity=N,xmit=PIN_C6,rcv=PIN_C7,bits=8, ERRORS) |
I get the compiler error: baud rate out of range.
Seems that 19200 is the maximum allowable by software, is that correct? |
|
|
Ttelmah Guest
|
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:10 am |
|
|
No.
The 'answer' is dependant on what crystal you use.
The baud rate generated must be within a small margin of the required rate. The compiler checks that the rate you are asking for, is within a reasonable margin. The errors are (for a 10Mhz crystal):
Code: |
10MHz
9600 1.73% OK
19200 1.72% OK
57600 9.58% N/G
|
Higher crystal frequencies, will allow higher rates to be selected OK, but also _lower_ fequencies, which are an exact binary multiple ofthe required frequency will allow this. So (for example), a crystal of 3.6864Mhz, will allow 57600bps to be selected with no error.
If you select a baud rate that is a binary sub division of your clock (assuming a 10MHz clock), 250000bps for example, this can be selected and the compiler will not complain.
The problem is that the higher 'standard' rates, require either a crystal chosen to generate them, or a lot larger division ratio (faster oscillator), to be developed accurately.
Best Wishes |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|