CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

Odd problem with hex data send via uart

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Requan



Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 74

View user's profile Send private message

Odd problem with hex data send via uart
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:26 am     Reply with quote

Hi,
In my modbus application i want to send float as hex via uart.
I converded float to hex and send data:
Code:

float ftValue= 21.34;
int32 decValue= f_PICtoIEEE(ftValue);
printf("%Lx",decValue)

but i received in terminal data in ascii so 8 bytes insted 4,
e.g. value 31 it sent as 33 31 instead 31.
How to fix it?
ckielstra



Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 3680
Location: The Netherlands

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:21 am     Reply with quote

It is not such an odd problem as the result is exactly as expected.
%Lx will send the data as human readable text, i.e. ASCII characters.
What I understand is that you want to receive the data as binary, not hex. Then use %Ld
Requan



Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 74

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 7:13 am     Reply with quote

Yes i want to receive the data as binary. I tried %Ld - not helps.
Only %c send proper but 1 byte only.
(my pic 18f67j60, ccs 4,132)
jeremiah



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 1354

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 9:47 am     Reply with quote

you're really better off just doing putc():

Code:

float ftValue= 21.34;
int32 decValue= f_PICtoIEEE(ftValue);
putc(make8(decValue,0));
putc(make8(decValue,1));
putc(make8(decValue,2));
putc(make8(decValue,3));


or you can order them 3,2,1,0 if you prefer big endian.
Requan



Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 74

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 6:56 am     Reply with quote

Arrow jeremiah
Thanks again.
Last question: what will be faster:
use function f_PICtoIEEE or use union?
temtronic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 9243
Location: Greensville,Ontario

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:49 am     Reply with quote

Learn by doing !!!

It'll only take you 5-10 minutes and you'll learn firsthand which is faster, just dump out the listing and check the code to see how and why one is faster, maybe..... it could be a tie.....

Also faster may not be better if it takes up more codespace (ROM)....
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19539

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 8:35 am     Reply with quote

I think you would have great problems doing what PICtoIEEE does with a union, and it'd certainly be a lot slower. Look at the source code. It is basically optimised as far as possible.
For what is being shown, you could replace the mak8's, with a union. Slightly tidier, and takes exactly the same time.
For the IEEE conversions, I did it years ago, before the functions were supplied, using a pointer, with the following code:
Code:

void toccs(int *Value) {
   //program to convert a 4 bytes 'word' from IEEE to CCS format
   int1 sign;
   sign = shift_left(&Value[1],1,0);
   sign = shift_left(&Value[0],1,sign);
   shift_right(&Value[1],1,sign);
}

void toIEEE(int *Value) {
   //complement to the above
   int1 sign;
   sign = shift_left(&Value[1], 1, 0);
   sign = shift_right(&Value[0], 1, sign);
   shift_right(&Value[1], 1, sign);
}

As you see, you basically have to relocate the sign bit inside the 4 bytes. The CCS supplied version is much more efficient, since it optimises the rotations, but this has the advantage of working anywhere in memory, instead of having to use fixed addresses. YPYM.

Best Wishes
Requan



Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 74

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 1:54 am     Reply with quote

Arrow Ttelmah
Thanks for good example.
I am still learning and i don't know if think in correct way, but i though about use union instead of function PICtoIEEE, e.g.
Code:

union my_var
{
float ft;
int8 b[4];
}temperature;


and put data in temperature.ft, next take from temperature.b
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19539

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 3:04 am     Reply with quote

No. That will replace the 'make8' functions being shown, but not do what PICtoIEEE does. The IEEE float format, has the two sign bits positioned differently. You have to pull the sign bit out of the second byte. Put this into the first byte in place of the sign bit that is there, then put the bit that was in the first byte back into the second.....
The code being shown uses the supplied function to do this, _then_ outputs the bytes, now in IEEE format. The actual output, can be done with a union, but not (easily) the bit swap. It could be done by declaring a structure, with the required bit fields, then using these to do the swap, and then the union to do the output.

Best Wishes
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group