|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Next_G
Joined: 11 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
|
16F877 Uart Question |
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:15 pm |
|
|
Hi To All
This is my first post. I hope somebody can give me a hand. I am trying to simulate a Phillips uart. This are using wr,rd,cs,int, d0-d7, a0-a3,rx,tx,reset, the other pins are not in use. Reading specs for the 16f877, I can use cs,rd,wr,d0-d7. The general idea is for a parallel to serial converter but i need all pins previously described. d0-d7 is for usage in port d, this data is exported to a application in vb6 in serial mode 9,600,n,8,1. With proper interrupts. It´s possibble the full emulation of duart chip?.
Thanks for any reply about this issue.
Next |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9269 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 2:43 pm |
|
|
When posting, please give a 'link' to any chips you're using, in this case the 'Philips' UART.
Also do you want FULL emulation? ie: BOTH serial to parallel AND parallel to serial, or just one of them? Also what kind of speed is required (baudrate)?
It's 'all in the details' but yes it is possible to do !! BTDT
Jay |
|
|
Next_G
Joined: 11 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
|
Uart Phillips |
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:43 pm |
|
|
Temtronic
Thank you for responding and I apologize if I miss information. The UART in question is the NXP sc26c92. The required emulation is only parallel to serial, the rest done by wr, rd, a0-a3, rx, tx. The transmission speed is 9600, n, 8, 1. If I still am not clear again I offer apologies and will give you even more information.
Thanks, again.
Next |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19589
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:44 am |
|
|
I'd say no.
Unfortunately, a lot depends on the code that is driving the Phillips chip.
Problem is that if the code controlling the UART, actually strobes the WRN and RDN lines at anything even remotely close to the 'allowed' minimum, your PIC will miss them. These are allowed to be just 70nSec wide. latching the data at this sort of speed, requires _hardware_.
There are PIC's that have external PSP ports, which with a bit of external logic, might be able to latch the data successfully.
Then the chip you are referring to, is a dual UART. At the very least you need a PIC with dual hardware UART's. A software UART is not suitable for receiving 'unsolicited' data, while the chip is doing other things, which the PIC is going to have to do.
So at the very least you would need a PIC with a PSP port and dual UART's.
There would need to be a little external logic to create the correct patterns to control the PSP from the UART signals. Then it might just about be doable.
The only PIC's with this sort of hardware, are all PIC18's, and much larger packages. For chips supporting 5v operation, devices like the 18F8527, or the 18F65K22, which are in 64pin or larger packages.
You could do it with almost any dual UART PIC, by having external latches. So using a FPGA to latch the data, or quite a number of discrete chips. |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9269 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 4:32 am |
|
|
I read his request as only needing one 'parallel to serial' section of the Philips UART and since the 'external' device was controllig the rd/wr/data lines using the PSP of the PIC for input is easy and converting to serial at 9600 even easier. You could even just use regular I/O pins as speed isn't 'fast' (9600 baud is 'slow' these days!)
Like I said, it's all in the details, and knowing 'what' is the input device is critical. As long as there is some type of 'new incoming data ready' flag it's
not that hard.
Jay |
|
|
asmboy
Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 2128 Location: albany ny
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:59 am |
|
|
Two words jump out :
that fresh from the Proteus ISIS works store room- "16f877" and
my all time hardware favorite :
"simulation" ....... |
|
|
Ttelmah
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 19589
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:11 am |
|
|
The big problem is just how fast the lines may be strobed. Point is that he is talking about the chip being used with Windows (refers to VB). This will then use the Windows driver, which will strobe the lines really fast. The actual data rate is not the problem, but I bet the Windows driver for the chip doesn't take any longer than it has to, between outputting the byte, and strobing it, and the strobe itself will probably only be a uSec at most.
If he does only want a single channel, then a chip with a single UART and PSP could be made to do it, but there would need to be a little external hardware, since the PSP needs a R/W line for bi-directional, and the chip uses separate read and write strobes. |
|
|
Next_G
Joined: 11 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
|
Uart Question |
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:13 am |
|
|
Hi To All
Thanks for all replies. It's true that this uart use wr, rd in separate ways. The uart scc68692 for example have only a single pin for both operations. However i need in separate ways. The write and read operations depends agree with datasheet, of the status in cs and int pins. About the speed really it' not a big trouble at least for now. About vb this is the way I test, for example if i receive from D0-D7 in hex format (25,43,67,72,24,36,54,34), if i receive 72, i need to reply 72 21. I'm using realterm for terminal purposes. The speed for testing is 200ms, obviously under the vb simulation the things colud be seen easily. To build in pic it's more complicated, the bits are present and i can see because is only under reading mode. However if i try to write probably i can't do because you need an interruption to write 72 21 and wait for a new reply. Again thanks, i think that better way to do this is get the original uart or a nearest possible replacement.
Next |
|
|
temtronic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 9269 Location: Greensville,Ontario
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:22 am |
|
|
OK, now I'm confused( yeah, 'Old Man Syndrome') ...
he said..
The required emulation is only parallel to serial
so I assumed he has a 'device' that HAS parallel data that has to be converted into serial( say to be read by the PC using VB ).
I really need a picture or drawing or napkin artwork to truly understand what IS required.
Jay |
|
|
dyeatman
Joined: 06 Sep 2003 Posts: 1941 Location: Norman, OK
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:13 am |
|
|
Not to mention all that work for a $5.60 chip...minus the cost of the PIC chip. _________________ Google and Forum Search are some of your best tools!!!! |
|
|
Next_G
Joined: 11 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
|
Uart Question |
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:06 pm |
|
|
Totally, Agree
However two things first, is a simple 5.60 chip easy to get probably in another countries, but not in mine, second the constant learning don`t have limits, and sometimes we want to be more creatives still when the solutions are around the corner, but for this reason write here and i`am happy whit all the feedback, again thanks to all for support, i`am sure that i can find the way.
Best Regards
Next |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|