CCS C Software and Maintenance Offers
FAQFAQ   FAQForum Help   FAQOfficial CCS Support   SearchSearch  RegisterRegister 

ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.

Please do not post bug reports on this forum. Send them to CCS Technical Support

would be better to connect unused pins or leave them unconne

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sareehy



Joined: 03 May 2016
Posts: 20

View user's profile Send private message

would be better to connect unused pins or leave them unconne
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 3:47 pm     Reply with quote

Hi,

Would be better to use the unused pins of mcu as i/p or o/p ?
or, should leave them unconnected ?

regards Smile
PCM programmer



Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 21708

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:33 pm     Reply with quote

Leave them unconnected, and set them to be low level output pins.
Do this near the start of main().

See this thread. The problem was a 10% error rate during SPI
transmission, caused by noise from unconnected pins on the PICs.
http://www.ccsinfo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=45371&start=15
Setting all unused pins to low level outputs solved the problem.

Example:
Code:

void main(void)
{
// Put variable declarations here.

init_unused_pins();
.
.
.
.




}

//-------------------------------------------------
// Set all unused pins to be low level outputs.

init_unused_pins(void)
{
output_low(PIN_A0);
output_low(PIN_A1);

output_low(PIN_B3);
output_low(PIN_B4);
output_low(PIN_B5);

output_low(PIN_C1);
output_low(PIN_C5);
}

This example assumes you are using Standard i/o mode (which is the
default mode of the compiler), and not Fast i/o mode.
Ttelmah



Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 19546

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:27 am     Reply with quote

I felt it possibly worth going a little further here.

Generally, on 99% of electronics, the thing that must be avoided, is having pins left as inputs, and floating. This is a very common way of generating problems.

Now on most electronics, you don't have the option to program pins as outputs, so on these you have to provide external pull-up or pull-down.
Which to use, actually depends on the technology involved. Historically 'TTL' IC's drew fractionally more power if you tried to pull the inputs 'down', rather than 'up', so external pull-ups became a common standard.
You then have 'why a resistor, rather than a direct short'?.
The reason, covers several things:
First, if you have a solid connection, and then accidentally or deliberately a signal is injected, you then have created a short. Not good. Being able to re-use a pin that is being pulled up, without making any change to the board, can be quite convenient at times.
Second, in some cases (depending on how supplies to the chip are actually implemented), there can be situations where parts of a chip power up before others. This again can give a short.
Then (of course) if the pin does at some time have an internal drive capability, and this gets enabled, again a short.
Then if for some reason the chip is not powered, this creates the possibility of it trying to draw power from the connection.

Now on the PIC, for 90%+ of the pins, you have the option to change it to an output, and drive it. This is obviously cheap to do, and effective in avoiding the pin floating. This is the option shown by PCM_Programmer in the above thread. The only 'caveat', is if the pin does get connected to something else that is also capable of driving, then the pull-up/down, does become the 'better' option.

It is surprising sometimes just how large a resistor can be and still prevent problems. When you realise just how high the input impedance of a CMOS gate can be, and that the FET's internally can act as rectification diodes, it becomes the realisation that an unconnected pin can be charged like a balloon with static, but also can act as a radio receiver.

Now this goes on to the second part of keeping a PIC circuit reliable. Good grounds, some local decoupling close to the PIC itself, and then ensure there are no floating input pins, and a very large percentage of the 'peculiar' problems that some people have with circuits, disappear....
sareehy



Joined: 03 May 2016
Posts: 20

View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:29 pm     Reply with quote

Thank you for useful information guys Smile

I appreciate your effort ^^

Could the mclr pin connection cause a similar problem ?
and what is the recommended connection for it ?

Smile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CCS Forum Index -> General CCS C Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group